ADJUSTING TODAY HOME PAGE
ADJUSTERS INTERNATIONAL

Advocating for the policyholder by valuing, documenting and settling their property damage claims.


Select a back issue of Adjusting Today
3042 - Difference in Conditions Coverage —
3041 - Earthquake Insurance:
3040 - Coinsurance/Insurance to Value Revisited:
3039 - Insurance Coverage For Collapse
3038 - Increased Cost of Construction Coverage
3037 - Builder's Risk Insurance:
3036 - Margin Clauses Making Agreed Value Options Extinct!
3035 - Equipment Breakdown Insurance:
3034 - Soft Cost or Delay in Opening:
3033 - Flood
3032 - Overhead & Profit:
3031 - The Effect of Sale of a Commercial Property on a Pending Insurance Claim
3030 - Pair, Set and Match: Replacement of Undamaged Hotel Furnishings
3029 - The Length of the Road Back from Disaster
3028 - How to Make the Most of an Underinsured Loss
3027 - Hurricanes and Windstorm Coverage
3026 - Functional Replacement Cost
3025 - Valuable Papers and Records
3023 - Salvage
3022 - Concurrent Causation
3021 - Agreed Value Clause
3020 - Business Income Insurance Q&A
3017 - Property Insurance Claims:
3016 - Disaster Recovery Planning
3015 - Multi-Family Complexes: (Apartment and Condo)
3015 - Hail Damage Can Create Difficult Insurance Claims
3013 - Valuing Business Income Exposures:
3012 - Proving an Insured Loss: Policyholders Need Experts Too
3011 - Disasters Raising Questions of Insurance Adequacy
3010 - Debris Removal and Pollution Damage
3009 - Ordinance or Law Coverage:
3008 - Business Income Insurance
3007 - Subrogation:
3006 - The Valuation Gap:
3005 - Sometimes It's What the Policy Doesn't Say That Counts!
3004 - Expecting the Unexpected Part of the Unexpected
3003 - Risk Assessment: Evaluating Coverage from a Loss Perspective
3002 - The Extended Period of Indemnity Endorsement
3002 - Coinsurance
2003 - E-Edition: Actual Cash Value Depreciation Deduction
2002 - E-Edition: Contingent Business Interruption Issues Continue
2001 - E-Edition: Japan Earthquake a Wake-Up Call for Contingent BI
Email Icon PDF Icon Bookmark and Share

Loss Consultants

Coinsurance What Insureds Need to Know

Page 3 of  4     Previous   1  2  3  4    Next  View issue on one page

Photo
Loss consultants from Adjusters International are sometimes asked to review, from a claims perspective, the property and business interruption coverages of companies concerned that their policy might not be adequate to cover a serious loss. In the course of such a review, the immediate priorities are usually to determine the values at risk; to ensure that the limits of liability are adequate; and to make sure that any existing coinsurance requirements are met. However, it's just as essential to remember less obvious but equally important areas of coverage whose existence, or lack thereof, can make significant differences in the insured's ultimate claim recovery.

One of the most important and helpful endorsements to a business interruption policy is the Extended Period of Indemnity Endorsement. If the business interruption coverage is being written under more recently issued forms, an automatic 30-day extended period of indemnity is built into the coverage. But absent one of these forms, this endorsement must be added to the policy to extend the indemnity period.

As its name suggests, the benefit of this coverage is that it extends the covered loss period beyond the time required to restore the property. In both mercantile and manufacturing businesses, the level of sales or production during the time following the restoration period is often not as high as the level would have been had no loss taken place.
Photo Additional time may be needed to restore revenues to preloss levels. Making the situation more critical is the fact that because the business is up and running, the full costs of operation are being absorbed without corresponding income. The effect of the revenue shortfall, therefore, goes right to the bottom line. With the proper coverage, however, the insured can be indemnified for the shortfall that occurs during the extended period.

This endorsement also opens up another avenue of indemnification for the insured—for expenses that otherwise would not be covered by the basic business interruption policy. The Extended Period of Indemnity Endorsement can enable the policyholder to recoup significant preopening expenses, incurred during the extended period, to restore revenues to their preloss levels. They might include extraordinary advertising
and public relations activities, or be related to locating and hiring new personnel.

These expenses are not ordinarily reimbursed under basic BI coverage because they do not qualify as normal operating expenses, nor would they be considered “expediting” expenses because they do not reduce the loss within the traditional loss period. On the other hand, these expenses do reduce the carrier's liability when the post-restoration period is covered by the Extended Period of Indemnity Endorsement.

Consider the following illustration: The REM corporation manufactures widgets to order. A fire causes extensive damage to the manufacturing facility, resulting in a shutdown and period of restoration of six months. When REM reopens, company officials find that their level of business is only 50 percent of what it would have been had the loss not occurred. The second month after reopening, the firm is realizing only 75 percent of anticipated volume. Ultimately, it takes four months after reopening to return to preloss levels.

One month before reopening, and for a considerable period thereafter, the company incurs significant additional expense contacting the trade to advise that it will be back in business shortly. Advertisements are placed in trade journals and representatives are sent around the world to assure customers that the company will be able to fill their orders.

Subscribe to Adjusting Today
Contact the Editor
Request Back Issues
Contact Adjusters International
ADJUSTINGTODAY.COM
ADJUSTERSINTERNATIONAL.COM

Privacy Policy